Mechanism (process and methodology) of Interdisciplinary research of Holy Qur’an
Subject Areas :Ahmad Akoochekian 1 * , Rezvane Dastjani 2
1 -
2 -
Keywords: interpretation of Holy Qur’an, interdisciplinary studies, developing, methodology, mechanism, obtaining the religion. ,
Abstract :
Questioning from methodology of approach research of interdisciplinary is a question about development which, in a systematic view and mechanism contain levels of paradigmatic basics, theoretical, conceptual model, operational and discursive level. Moreover, it would be practical in religion via comprehensive system of perception focused on growth-development, in the evolution leadership pattern in two angles of leading comprehensive science and scientific map and with converging on the principal of Velayat Faqih in religion. Furthermore, existing the growth-development expectation from religion, in other words the issue of comprehensive developing, is necessity to have methodological studies of interdisciplinary and multi string based on understanding the progress. Having no alternative, this required three levels of problem ology, theology and forthcoming till with this could utilize from methodology of obtaining in religion and Velayat for managing culture and transition. Passing from approaches of components of knowledge and branch fields to interdisciplinary approaches, especially in Qur’anic studies, wasn’t find its interference paradigm, so this interference paradigm is the knowledge of developing. Furthermore, a reason for inability of entering to knowledgebase is ignoring the interference field. This article with approach of Qur’anic reference (the principal of guided to grow) with utilizing from progressive methodology of responding to a posteriori and research and developing and protective methodologies such as systematic methodology via matrix and algorithmic process tries with expanding Qur’anic thoughts for development (knowledge basis of interpretational Qur’anic school) achieve a methodological aspect of futurist research of Qur’anic developing through better ordering three system of ordinal, revelation and subjective futurist interpretation. In view of that, the article would discuss this interpretational school for modulation of basic model of Islamic developing.
ایمان، محمد تقی (1391). فلسفه روش تحقیق در علوم انسانی. قم: پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه.
آراسته،ح.ر (1388). میانرشتهایها در آموزش عالی. فصلنامه مطالعات میانرشتهای در علوم انسانی، 2، 25-40.
قراملکی، احدفرامرز (1392). روششناسی مطالعات دینی. مشهد: دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی.
کاپرا، فریتیوف (1392). پیوندهای پنهان (تلفیق گسترههای زیستس، شناختی و اجتماعی حیات در علم پایداری). ترجمه محمد حریری اکبری، تهران: نشر نی.
کلاین، جولی تامسون (1389). فرهنگ در میانرشتهای در آموزش عالی. ترجمه هدایت الله اعتمادی زاده و نعمت الله موسیپور، تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی.
متین، منصور (1388). تفکر میان رشتهای. قم: بوستان کتاب.
مجلسی، محمدباقر (1404). بحارالانوار. ج 1، 177.
محمودی محمدآبادی، طیبه (1395). بارفتن ذهن در کشمکش بلور ساختارها. مجموعه مقالات ششمین کنفرانس مرکز الگو، مقاله منتشر شده در ششمین کنفرانس ملی تعمیق و تکمیل الگوی پایه پیشرف.
نیکول، ر.کوله (1388). آموزش دانشگاهی و مطالعات میانرشتهای. ترجمه دکتر محمدرضا دهشیری، تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری.
Gibbons, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Societies. London: Sage publications
. Palmer, Carole (1999). Structures and Strategies of interdisciplinary science, Journal of the American society for information science and technology.