مقاله


کد مقاله : 13970714164773

عنوان مقاله : Quran-based systematization; What, why and how

نشریه شماره : 18 Spring-Summer 2018

مشاهده شده : 249

فایل های مقاله :


نویسندگان

  نام و نام خانوادگی پست الکترونیک مرتبه علمی مدرک تحصیلی مسئول
1 Hussein Babaee Mojarad h.babaee64@gmail.com Associate Professor PhD
2 Muhammad AbdolHusseinZadeh AbdolHusseinZadeh@gmail.com Graduate M.Sc

چکیده مقاله

Systemization in common language and sometimes in scientific discourse have spiritual common meaning for four proof of “system logy” (in genesis field), “finding system” (in legislation field), “making system” (in credits field) and “stablishing system” (in objective field). Although, in particular, “making system” is observing credits and social contracts which, is establish in any sub-system. Hence, the author believed that “making system” with its general meaning is contain all four fields and Holy Qur’an, as a religious epistemology source, is in all four field. According to this, each field is acquired to that field. Furthermore, if the process of “making system” became ignored or did not based on Qur’an principles then the process of solving problems and system’s challenges won’t base on monotheistic realism and idealism. Therefore, different social sub-systems would become panacea for delusive or non-priority issues, imposition and oriented toward non-Islamic ideals. This deviation from religious trusted sources, on one hand, would failed Islamic system in establishing its material and spiritual purposes, which, this would have doubted elites and people of the system through revolutionary identity of Islamic system. And on other hand, this would lead to establishment of social sub-system, autocracy (though small), arrogance (though in a small part) and establishment of secular governance (though smoothly but theorized). The process of “making system” is making credit in form of moving from origin to matters (having brief knowledge through recognizing the basis and giving priority to matters), and moving from matters toward sources (for re-reading) and reforming (re-defining), origins (having lasting knowledge through origins) and finally moving from origins to matters for defining, explaining, sensing and solving problems. Although, must bear in mind that in this movement, which, is detailed and brevity, having inner flexibility for reformation, moving gradually toward evolution is continuation for making system.